I both loath and lack the sufficient narcissism to write a good opinion essay. My assignment was to write a simple opinion essay for ENG 112, arguing specifically for or against a topic that is decidedly unprovable. I chose to argue for the existence of time travel, since the other suggested topic were of less interest to me. I ultimately wrote a paper which now can be interpreted as professing the non-existence of time travel, as well as allowing for the existence of (and even a slight titillation for) actual time travel to be realized. I find the natural tendency for me to skirt but never commit to an opinion fascinating. With the lack of solid, factual evidence, I danced around the concept for 2 pages, only to conclude (with a relative cop-out) that time travel does exist and has always, so long as we redefine what "time travel" actually is. I suppose a follow-up including the peer-reception and instructor grade is in order. Look for part two [link will come]
I once heard that I do not listen to enough music by female artists. Being that I care for my musical tastes to be diverse and eclectic, I was shocked that my inclusivity of women was lacking. I have a good number of female artists or lead vocalists in my music collection, yet that doesn't count? I though, "must my ratio be in favor of women to win this concept?" I also thought about how there are simply fewer women in the music industry than men. It can't be my fault if there is a poor ratio of total options in existence. Some things to consider: it is important (in feminism) to work toward equality, often at an extreme. This includes supporting FEMALES over males, even if the product is of less quality (this is not an implication that such a reality exists, but that one could liken it to a startup product like solar panels that need adoption in the early years to provide the revenue for further development) - providing the space for space's sake as well as...